POLICY AND INNOVATION GROUP
  • HOME
  • About
    • Policy and Innovation Group
    • The team
    • Contact
  • Policy Guidance
    • Policymakers Toolkit
  • Projects
    • Present Projects >
      • EnFAIT
      • FORWARD2030
      • MAXBLADE
      • SEETIP Ocean
      • SuperGen ORE
    • Past Projects: Devices and subsystems >
      • C-Gen
      • CLEARWATER
      • E-Drive
      • Elasto
      • EMERGE
      • FLOTANT
      • Hi-Drive
      • IMAGINE
      • Inflatable DEG–PTO
      • LEANWIND
      • NeSSIE
      • OPERA
      • ORECCA
      • TiPA
      • TROPOS
      • UMACK
      • Waveboost
      • Wavetrain
    • Past Projects: Tools and coordination >
      • DTOcean
      • DTOceanPlus
      • ETIP Ocean
      • ETIP Ocean 2
      • EVOLVE
      • IEC
      • International Marine Energy Attractiveness Index
      • MARINET
      • OES Vision for Ocean Energy
      • SI OCEAN
      • SuperGEN
      • UKERC
      • UKERC Book
  • Publications
    • Reports
    • Papers
    • Roadmaps >
      • UKERC Roadmap
      • ETI Roadmap
      • MEAP
      • US Roadmap
      • Canadian Roadmap
      • ORECCA Roadmap
      • OES Vision for Ocean Energy
      • Chilean Roadmap
    • Wave Energy Programme
  • Sector Engagement
    • EERA
    • ETIP Ocean
    • OES IEA
    • Consultancy
  • HOME
  • About
    • Policy and Innovation Group
    • The team
    • Contact
  • Policy Guidance
    • Policymakers Toolkit
  • Projects
    • Present Projects >
      • EnFAIT
      • FORWARD2030
      • MAXBLADE
      • SEETIP Ocean
      • SuperGen ORE
    • Past Projects: Devices and subsystems >
      • C-Gen
      • CLEARWATER
      • E-Drive
      • Elasto
      • EMERGE
      • FLOTANT
      • Hi-Drive
      • IMAGINE
      • Inflatable DEG–PTO
      • LEANWIND
      • NeSSIE
      • OPERA
      • ORECCA
      • TiPA
      • TROPOS
      • UMACK
      • Waveboost
      • Wavetrain
    • Past Projects: Tools and coordination >
      • DTOcean
      • DTOceanPlus
      • ETIP Ocean
      • ETIP Ocean 2
      • EVOLVE
      • IEC
      • International Marine Energy Attractiveness Index
      • MARINET
      • OES Vision for Ocean Energy
      • SI OCEAN
      • SuperGEN
      • UKERC
      • UKERC Book
  • Publications
    • Reports
    • Papers
    • Roadmaps >
      • UKERC Roadmap
      • ETI Roadmap
      • MEAP
      • US Roadmap
      • Canadian Roadmap
      • ORECCA Roadmap
      • OES Vision for Ocean Energy
      • Chilean Roadmap
    • Wave Energy Programme
  • Sector Engagement
    • EERA
    • ETIP Ocean
    • OES IEA
    • Consultancy

What are the UK power system benefits from deployments of wave and tidal stream generation?

Picture
This study quantifies the potential power system benefits that the UK stands to gain through the deployment of marine energy technologies (wave and tidal stream) in domestic waters.
These system benefits are primarily due to the temporal and spatial offsetting of wave and tidal resource with other, more established variable renewables, such as wind and solar. Wave and tidal generation can be available at times of low wind or solar resource, helping to balance the overall renewable power profile. It has been found that a more diverse generation mix including marine energy is consistently more available and better able to meet demand than a renewable generation mix comprising of only wind and solar.

The key results show:
  • Energy planning modelling projects 6.4 GW of wave and 6.2 GW of tidal stream deployments in GB by 2050, if the SET Plan targets are reached by 2030.
  • Previous work has shown that the resultant value to the UK economy from these deployments would be up to £8.9bn Gross Value Added.
  • This study shows that the potential power system benefits of this 12.6 GW deployment of marine energy would be up to £1.03bn reduction in dispatch costs per annum.
  • This cost reduction comes from a higher dispatch of renewable energy – by up to 27 TWh (+6%), and thus a lower requirement for expensive peaking generation – by as much as 24 TWh (-16%) when wave and tidal generation are part of the electricity mix, compared with a scenario without marine energy generation.
  • Additionally, the scenario which includes marine energy demonstrates a higher ability to meet domestic (GB) demand with domestic generation, as it requires 5 TWh less (-65%) battery use and 3 GWh less (-6%) energy imports over interconnectors.

Proudly powered by Weebly